As far as I am concerned the reason Al Gore made Inconvenient Truth has more to do with his ego and less to do with Global Warming. When he was the VP for Clinton he was the environmental candidate, but when he ran against Bush he pushed his environmental stance to the side and started talking about lock boxes. As a result, Nader became the environmental candidate which I think led to Gore's defeat. So what does Gore do, he hides, grows a beard, gets fat and pouts. 4 years later he emerges from his cocoon as the environmental guru and shortly after Inconvenient Truth is made.

The movie wasn't designed to teach us about Global Warming, but was rather designed to show Americans that they made mistake electing George Bush. That's why in the beginning of the movie he talks about Bush stealing the election and later about his kid and angus beef all of which have nothing to do global warming. Therefore, no evidence is going to change Gore's mind. He is a snake oil salesman and has gained a lot of respect and a lot of money through global warming.

Al Gore is simply a stalking horse for the globalists, using global warming and carbon taxes to establish the UN as the central world government, ultimately with absolute power (which taxation by fiat is, in fact.) Always manipulating us through precedents.

Global warming is difficult to prove, and there are powerful propagandizing forces on both sides of the issue. Ice core analysis demonstrates that carbon dioxide lags temperature increases over the eons. Dinosaurs didn't have Hummers. The oceans release more carbon dioxide with one degree of global temperature increase than the entire combined output of all human development. I suspect the recent thawing of the Arctic Ocean was accomplished through the fifty-two HAARP transmitters scattered throughout the world, to facilitate access to mineral deposits and lend credence to the hypothesis of global warming.
(To get an idea of the capabilities of HAARP consider that its power consumption is one third of the entire lower forty-eight states, and that it's driven by its own humongous natural gas deposit. Also look up the heterodyne effect and the piezo-electric effect, and consider its likely use as an earthquake weapon, to persuade China, for example.)

Yes, hopefully the movie will publicize the underhanded globalist motives of Gore, as Moore's movie did for the Bush crime family. Both political parties are controlled by the same people, who also own the world's central banks, with the end goal of a world socialist state patterned on Red China, and death to anyone who doesn't like it, as well as to ninety-five percent of humanity in any case.

Coincidence theorists are directed to the writings of Bishop Pike, once America's highest ranking Mason, founder of the KKK, and Confederate General. He recounted the history of the twentieth century from the perspective of the mid-nineteenth, with both world wars, and the present war fulminated between Judeo-Christian and Islamic cultures. It wasn't a psychic prediction, but the revelation of a plan. Ayn Rand's book, "Atlas Shrugged" was an encoded blueprint for the conversion of America into a socialist dictatorship. Caroll Quigley and David Rockefeller have also been very open in their globalist goals in their own writings, doubtless assuming the populace has been sufficiently dumbed down to notice or care, as this was the goal for the educational system. They may be right.

On a brighter note, here's a look into the future at next July 4th's New York Times. (I distance myself from some of the leftist-theftist concepts therein.)
web.nytimes-seDOTcom